Plenty of good traders journal in Excel, Google Sheets or Notion, and if yours works, keep it. The trouble starts at volume: every trade typed by hand, formulas that break, and no live view of how close a prop account is to its limit. RB Trading syncs MT4, MT5 and cTrader on its own and takes your old sheet as a CSV.
Happy with your spreadsheet? Keep it. Import the CSV and see what the journal finds in the same trades, free for the first 50, no card.

Pro is $29.99 a month. Refund in full within 30 days of your first payment, one email to journal@rbtrading.site.
How it reads a synced account and points at what is costing you.
The short version
Disclosure
The same threads also had traders advising others to stay on a sheet. Both views are fair, and the right answer depends on how much you trade.
A fair comparison, including where the sheet wins.
| RB Trading Pro Journal | Spreadsheet or Notion | |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | Free for 50 trades in total; Pro $29.99 a month | Free |
| Getting trades in | Live MT4, MT5 and cTrader sync; file import and a generic CSV mapper for the rest | Typed or pasted by hand |
| Layout freedom | Set fields, plus your own notes | Total. Any column you want |
| Prop drawdown room | Prop Tracker with breach alerts | Only if you build and update it |
| Analytics | Pro: full analytics, reports and RB Score. Free: P&L calendar and risk tools | Whatever formulas you write |
| AI trade review | 3 in total free, 30 a day on Pro | No |
| Your data | Cloud backup, full export, export after cancelling | Your own file |
RB facts from rbtrading.site/pricing, checked 30 Oct 2026.
You do not have to start again. Export the sheet as a CSV and the generic CSV mapper brings it in once you tag the columns. Import the same file twice and nothing doubles up. From then on, MT4, MT5 and cTrader trades sync on their own through the read-only RBSync add-on.
We do not offer a template download. If you are still deciding what to track, our post on trading log templates covers the columns worth keeping.
A sheet is free forever. Our free plan stops at 50 trades in total, and full analytics, backtesting and replay are Pro only.
A sheet tracks anything. If your edge depends on a field no journal has, a sheet will always be more flexible.
No live futures sync. RB has no live Rithmic, ProjectX or TopstepX connection; futures come in by file import, much like pasting into a sheet.
Stay if you place a few trades a week, you enjoy building your own tracking, you trade one personal account with no prop rules, or your sheet already answers the questions you ask of it. That is a working journal.
Move if you are typing more than you are reviewing, if you trade prop challenges and need to know the room left today, or if you keep meaning to analyse the sheet and never do.
Import your CSV or sync MT4, MT5 or cTrader. 50 trades free, no card.
Start free, 50 trades, no cardHappy with your spreadsheet? Keep it. Import the CSV and see what the journal finds in the same trades, free for the first 50, no card.

Pro is $29.99 a month. Refund in full within 30 days of your first payment, one email to journal@rbtrading.site.
For a handful of trades a week, often yes. A spreadsheet or Notion page is free, flexible and fully yours. It gets harder as volume grows: every trade is typed or pasted by hand, formulas break when columns move, and drawdown limits have to be built and checked yourself.
Yes. Export your sheet as a CSV and the generic CSV mapper brings it in once you tag the columns. Import the same file again and nothing doubles up. MT4, MT5 and cTrader accounts can also sync live through the read-only RBSync add-on.
RB Trading does not offer a template download. Our blog post on trading log templates covers what columns to track. If you would rather not build one, RB's free plan covers your first 50 trades with live MT4, MT5 and cTrader sync, no card.
Either works for notes and simple tables. Neither connects to your broker, so trades are entered by hand, and neither tracks prop drawdown room live unless you build it. A dedicated journal does both, at the cost of less freedom over the layout.